Direct and indirect discrimination

This is when you are treated worse than another person or other people because:

Your circumstances must be similar enough to the circumstances of the person being treated better for a valid comparison to be made.

If you cannot point to another person who has been treated better, it is still direct discrimination if you can show that a person who did not have your protected characteristic would have been treated better in similar circumstances.

To be unlawful, the treatment must have happened in one of the situations that are covered by the Equality Act. For example, in the workplace or when you are receiving goods or services.

It is possible to be discriminated against by someone who shares the same protected characteristic as you.

If you have been treated worse due to your age, this may be allowed if the organisation or employer can show that there was a good reason for the difference in treatment. This is known as objective justification. If you are treated worse due to any other protected characteristic, it is unlawful direct discrimination whether or not the organisation or employer has a reason for it.

Indirect discrimination

Indirect discrimination happens when there is a policy that applies in the same way for everybody but disadvantages a group of people who share a protected characteristic, and you are disadvantaged as part of this group. If this happens, the person or organisation applying the policy must show that there is a good reason for it.

A ‘policy’ can include a practice, a rule or an arrangement. It makes no difference whether anyone intended the policy to disadvantage you or not.

To prove that indirect discrimination is happening or has happened:

If the organisation can show there is a good reason for its policy, it is not indirect discrimination. This is known as objective justification.